... | ... | @@ -70,3 +70,22 @@ It is clearly visible, that for evolution with the cubic cutoff the energy is co |
|
|
* [spherical.wlog](uploads/e642fe76e9496d2305f4c462ebc61e72/spherical.wlog)
|
|
|
|
|
|
In conclusion, we find that typically for trajectories of length $`te_F\approx1000`$ the spherical cutoff provides reasonable accuracy, while for generation of long trajectories $`te_F\gg 1000`$ it is recommended to use the cubic cutoff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Known issues
|
|
|
Below we present results for the uniform unitary Fermi gas as a function of lattice spacing, while keeping the fixed volume of the box. Note that the lattice spacing defines value of the energy cut-off $`E_c\approx\frac{p_c^2}{2}=\frac{\pi^2}{2DX^2}`$. Conditions of the test are as follow:
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
# VOLUME: 32 x 32 x 32
|
|
|
# ENERGY DENSITY FUNCTIONAL: SLDA
|
|
|
# UNIFORM_TEST_MODE: Setting number of particles to be: (554.000000,554.000000)
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
The result for the total energy is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DX | Spherical cut-off | Cubic cut-off |
|
|
|
| -----|-------------------|---------------|
|
|
|
| 1.0 | 0.39761 | 0.39926 |
|
|
|
| 0.8 | 0.39834 | 0.38539 |
|
|
|
| 0.5 | 0.39825 | 0.36422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the case of the cubic cut-off, we observe the dependence of the lattice spacing. This issue needs further investigation.
|
|
|
For raw data see: [test-spherical-vs-cubic.txt](uploads/4c97d8a36df69d5d8e1c698839e2f2ed/test-spherical-vs-cubic.txt) |