|
|
|
The functional must be selected at compilation stage in *predefines.h* file:
|
|
|
|
```c
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* Select functional:
|
|
|
|
* - SLDA:
|
|
|
|
* for simulating unitary Fermi gas,
|
|
|
|
* it sets effective mass of particles to 1.0 which assures better convergence properties,
|
|
|
|
* in case of time time-dependent calculations SLDA is about 2x faster than ASLDA.
|
|
|
|
* - ASLDA:
|
|
|
|
* for simulating unitary Fermi gas,
|
|
|
|
* at qualitative level it produces results compatible with SLDA, however it is more accurate,
|
|
|
|
* due to presence of current terms in the functional it has worse convergence properties.
|
|
|
|
* - BDG:
|
|
|
|
* for simulating systems in BCS regime,
|
|
|
|
* equations of motion are equivalent to Bogoliubov-de-Gennes equations,
|
|
|
|
* you MUST set aBdG value in input file when using this functional.
|
|
|
|
* */
|
|
|
|
// #define FUNCTIONAL SLDA
|
|
|
|
#define FUNCTIONAL ASLDA
|
|
|
|
// #define FUNCTIONAL BDG
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ASLDA - asymmetric superfluid local density approximation
|
|
# ASLDA - asymmetric superfluid local density approximation
|
|
The functional has the generic form:
|
|
The ASLDA functional has been designed in order to capture properties of **strongly interacting unitary Fermi gas**. The functional has the generic form:
|
|
```math
|
|
```math
|
|
\begin{aligned}
|
|
\begin{aligned}
|
|
\mathcal{E}_{\textrm{edf}}(n,\nu,\ldots) & = \alpha_{\uparrow}(n_{\uparrow},n_{\downarrow})\frac{\tau_{\uparrow}}{2} +
|
|
\mathcal{E}_{\textrm{edf}}(n,\nu,\ldots) & = \alpha_{\uparrow}(n_{\uparrow},n_{\downarrow})\frac{\tau_{\uparrow}}{2} +
|
... | @@ -62,3 +84,13 @@ The term in ASLDA functional that depends on the currents $`\bm{j}_{\sigma}`$ in |
... | @@ -62,3 +84,13 @@ The term in ASLDA functional that depends on the currents $`\bm{j}_{\sigma}`$ in |
|
|
|
|
|
Below we provide plot showing relative energy change (in %) between simulations of SLDA and ASLDA that compute the energy of N fermions (both even and odd particle numbers) in the spin-symmetric unitary Fermi gas trapped in an isotropic harmonic oscillator. For more info see [supplemental material of this paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.4266).
|
|
Below we provide plot showing relative energy change (in %) between simulations of SLDA and ASLDA that compute the energy of N fermions (both even and odd particle numbers) in the spin-symmetric unitary Fermi gas trapped in an isotropic harmonic oscillator. For more info see [supplemental material of this paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/1306.4266).
|
|
![slda_vs_aslda](uploads/073efe244d1ab67bed1314af5cf0fc21/slda_vs_aslda.png)
|
|
![slda_vs_aslda](uploads/073efe244d1ab67bed1314af5cf0fc21/slda_vs_aslda.png)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# BdG - Bogoliubov de-Gennes functional
|
|
|
|
The BdG functional is equivalent to Bogoliubov de-Gennes mean-field approximation. This approximation is valid in BCS regime, under assumption $`-ak_F`<1$. The functional has form:
|
|
|
|
```math
|
|
|
|
\mathcal{E}_{\textrm{edf}}(n,\nu,\ldots) = \frac{\tau_{\uparrow}}{2} +
|
|
|
|
\frac{\tau_{\downarrow}}{2}
|
|
|
|
+ g\nu^{\dagger}\nu
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The (bare) coupling constant $`g`$ is related to scattering length by the formula $`g=4\pi\hbar^2a/m`$.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |