| ... | @@ -82,6 +82,6 @@ For the test, we used ASLDA functional with the parameters provided in https://a |
... | @@ -82,6 +82,6 @@ For the test, we used ASLDA functional with the parameters provided in https://a |
|
|
The graph below shows the sensitivity of the energy and the pairing gap as a function of the $`k_F/k_c`$, for the calculations with spherical cut-off. In this case, the energy is almost not sensitive to the choice of the $`k_F/k_c`$, while the pairing gap shows some residual dependence, but at an acceptable level.
|
|
The graph below shows the sensitivity of the energy and the pairing gap as a function of the $`k_F/k_c`$, for the calculations with spherical cut-off. In this case, the energy is almost not sensitive to the choice of the $`k_F/k_c`$, while the pairing gap shows some residual dependence, but at an acceptable level.
|
|
|

|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The next graph shows the results of the same test, but with the activated cubi cutoff scheme. In this case, we observe quantitative degradation of the quality of the results. This issue needs further investigation.
|
|
The next graph shows the results of the same test, but with the activated cubic cutoff scheme. In this case, we observe quantitative degradation of the quality of the results. This issue needs further investigation.
|
|
|

|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|