Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
  • wslda wslda
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 0
    • Issues 0
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 0
    • Merge requests 0
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Package Registry
    • Container Registry
    • Infrastructure Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
    • Value stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • wtools
  • wsldawslda
  • Wiki
  • Regularization schemes of the pairing field

Regularization schemes of the pairing field · Changes

Page history
Update Regularization schemes of the pairing field authored Jan 02, 2026 by Gabriel Wlazłowski's avatar Gabriel Wlazłowski
Show whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Regularization-schemes-of-the-pairing-field.md
View page @ aefab54e
......@@ -74,12 +74,12 @@ In conclusion, we find that typically for trajectories of length $`te_F\approx10
# Impact of the regularization scheme on the quality of static results
Below, we present results for the uniform unitary Fermi gas as a function of gas density measured by $`k_F=(3\pi^2 n)^{1/3}`$ and scaled with respect to the cut-off momentum $`k_c=\pi/dx`$. Note that the lattice spacing defines the value of the energy cut-off $` E_c\approx\frac{k_c^2}{2}=\frac{\pi^2}{2dx^2}`$. It is a technical parameter, so the results should not depend on its choice (assuming that it is chosen from a reasonable range). We also note that typical applications utilize $`k_F dx\approx 1`$ (or $`k_F dx/\pi\approx 0.32`$).
For the test, we used ASLDA function with the parameters provided in https://arxiv.org/abs/1008.3933, and which were adjusted in such a way to provide for the spin-symmetric case:
For the test, we used ASLDA functional with the parameters provided in https://arxiv.org/abs/1008.3933, and which were adjusted in such a way to provide for the spin-symmetric case:
```math
\frac{E}{E_{\rm{FG}}}=0.40(1),\quad \frac{\Delta}{\varepsilon_F}=0.504(24)
```
The graph below shows the sensitivity of the energy and the pairing gap as a function of the $`k_F/k_c`$, for the calculations with spherical cut-off. In this case, the energy is almost not sensitive to the choice of the $`k_F/\k_c`$, while the pairing gap shows some residual dependence, but at an acceptable level.
The graph below shows the sensitivity of the energy and the pairing gap as a function of the $`k_F/k_c`$, for the calculations with spherical cut-off. In this case, the energy is almost not sensitive to the choice of the $`k_F/k_c`$, while the pairing gap shows some residual dependence, but at an acceptable level.
![spehrical-cutoff](uploads/0fa452388ed3b8f200e11bb3f5838e68/spehrical-cutoff.png)
The next graph shows the results of the same test, but with the activated cubi cutoff scheme. In this case, we observe quantitative degradation of the quality of the results. This issue needs further investigation.
......
Clone repository

Content of Documentation
Official webpage
W-BSK Toolkit